​Have you ever questioned why you went into your particular profession? Our professions or jobs usually shape our lives and our attitude toward others. Our job occupies and dominates at least a third of our stint on this earth — 8 hours in a 24-hour day. Our profession or job makes us who we are. Choosing the right job is one of the most important life-decisions we will ever make. Here is a list of a few random professions: accountant, doctor, dentist, nurse, actor, lawyer, priest, biologist, chemist, engineer, psychologist, teacher, armed services, receptionist, payroll clerk, new car salesperson, farmer, welder, and plant worker. There may exist 1000s of professions, even the oldest profession in the world. So why does one choose a particular profession? Is the process of job choice a random happenstance or a predetermined, dedicated determinism? Some people are born knowing what they will do with the rest of their life. Those that dream about planes and learn to fly at an early age somehow know that they will become airline pilots or jet fighter pilots. Some may be associated with a family business and are expected to continue in that line of work. However, most job seekers are not as fortunate as the above two examples and most struggle to find that perfect career.

What does your profession or job choice have to say about you? I did not want to become a lawyer at an early age. In fact, I can remember staring out of our glass door of my childhood home during high school, looking over the soybeans fields and dreaming of becoming the CEO of a large company. Well life got in the way. I got married at a young age and pursued an accounting degree in college. When I could never get my balance sheets to add up, I decided to become an economist. I thought I liked abstract economic theory. When I graduated from college with an economics degree, I ran into difficulty finding a job. What value is an economics degree without a masters or doctorate? I did not possess a trade. Therefore, I became a Boy Scout District Executive out of necessity. What a noble name for such an obscure job. The job position was manufactured for me. My uncle was big in the scouts and he encouraged the council executive to create Avoyelles Parish as its own scouting district with one caveat. I had to raise enough money from my newly created district to pay my salary. I remember my salary was no more than $13,000 a year in 1985. I was the CEO of my district though. I worked from home servicing existing packs and troops and starting new packs and troops. I helped train the leaders and organized and supervised scouting events. And, of course, I threw a lot of fundraising events and personally contacted several wealthy individual donors. Unfortunately, there existed no multinational corporations in the little town I grew up in. Strangely enough, after I graduated from college, I was living right next door to the house I had those dreams, in that little town I so desperately wanted to leave. (My mother let my wife and I live in an old wooden house she owned next to the family home rent-free.)

I was not making the money of a CEO while working with the Boy Scouts, so I decided to apply for law school and take the LSAT. My LSAT score was average and because of the political connections of my family, I got myself accepted to law school and moved back to the college town I had just left only a year and a half earlier. The wife soon followed after receiving her LPN degree. In my naivete, I wanted to become a lawyer because lawyers made lots of money. Money was now controlling my job choices and life decisions. Moreover, money controlled much of my legal career until I finally accumulated enough of it and realized that money does not make one happy.
So let us address the initial question. Have you ever questioned why you went into your particular job or profession? If you randomly fell into your job or if you are just starting out and don’t know what you want to be when you grow up, let these next few ideas I present guide you. The first idea was already mentioned. Money does not make you happy. Do not seek your profession or job based upon the average salary in that industry. The second idea is unique. Decide if you are a people person or not. By people person, I do not mean a person who is the life of the party or a person who can become friends with everyone. A people person career is a job that has the well-being of others at heart. For example, a real doctor truly has his patient’s health as his primary concern. A genuine priest has the well-being of the souls of his followers at heart. An authentic teacher has the education of her students as the primary reason for getting up in the morning.

Initially, I was not a people person. I did not care for the boys in scouting. As a lawyer, I did not have the legal problems of my clients as my primary and most important objective. Over time, I had to realize and grow into empathy. I can now tell you that real accountants care about their clients’ finances, real navy seals care about their country’s security, real doctors care about their patients’ health, real dentist care about their patients’ teeth and real lawyers care about, fret about and stress over their clients’ legal problems. Real, authentic and caring professionals are people persons.
​
Here is the nitty gritty. If you have already chosen your profession and are not happy but want to become happy, become a people person. If you have not yet chosen a profession and are just starting out, determine if you are a people person. If you decide that you are not a sincere people person, if you do not have a predestined professional desire like the pilot and if you do not have a family trade or business to step into, then you are an individualist. An individualist is one who works for others without patients or clients. Take for example, a welder or farmer. They weld or farm. A concern for their fellow human’s health, teeth, education or legal problems, for example, do not make them tick. As an individualist, their main driving force may be the love of their trade. In any event, do not let your choice of profession be determined by chance or the desire of money, as mine was. Do not follow my path. I hated the legal profession. Again, my primary concern, at least initially, was not my clients, but making lots of money. If you are not a people person, choose individualist jobs that make you happy. If you are a people person, chose a job with your patient or client at heart. Your life will be so much more enjoyable and gratifying.

President Trump
Thank you for finally issuing an executive order that does not allow illegals to be counted for apportionment in the census. You should also ban mail-in-ballots for all federal elections for President and congress and you should require voter ID if anyone wants to vote for a candidate for President or Congress. The states can allow mail in ballots for their state and local elections all day long if they want to.

     A silent jihad is happening around the world and the cause is a fight for globalism. It is silent because the Open Society Foundations (formerly the Open Society Institute) and the foundations established and supported by George Soros and other like-minded, wealthy individuals exploit the causes and plight of others to further their globalist agenda. It is a jihad because their fight is against a world order that has existed since the establishment of the nation-states in the West four and five hundred years ago. Their vision of a one-world government is this: every citizen on planet earth is treated alike, with the same standard of living, the same education, the same housing, the same income, all produced by a single economy and single currency with world market efficiencies. These grand but worn fallacies emerged from the exaggerated marvels of socialism. These globalists manipulate two main causes around the world to exploit societies to their advantage: immigration and race. They use politicians and anarchists to plead the plight of others to foment hatred among the populace for the purpose of societal change. They demarcate perceived wrongs within current social reality and identify actors to change it. Nationalism is a direct threat to their vision of an “open society” thus they use identified racial and immigration injustices as tools to mold the mentality of the average, uninformed citizen and average, uninformed politician to their advantage. The removal of President Trump from office is their immediate goal. They commingle and obscure economic nationalism with ethnic nationalism, which are clearly distinguishable terms. They also use the terms economic nationalism and fascism as having the same meaning. This movement is not a short-term scheme. Their plot envisions a lengthy conspiracy stretched over another hundred years or so.

Desperate Treatment of Races by Each Other
​
     Racial injustice is a prime crisis to exploit. The so-called lingering disadvantages of slavery tug at the heartstrings of liberal Americans. Oppression, lack of proper housing, jobs and education and ostracism are vestiges of slavery. But remember, slavery proliferated for thousands of years in Europe and east Asia before America was ever discovered. African tribes enslaved their rivals and sold their fellow Africans to European slave traders who brought their captives to the New World. Racial injustice existed in the past, there is no doubt. America finally stamped out slavery throughout the world by a civil war in this country 150 years ago. (A new form of slavery exists today- sex trafficking.) The civil rights movement and resultant legislation created a level playing field for race relations. Blacks have become much more affluent and educated and fully immersed in our political and economic systems. Millennials and GenXers do not think in terms of black vs white anymore. Yet anarchists need a cause to exploit.
     The militant groups, like antifa, exploit any racial incident in order to further their cause, a falsely concocted notion that nationalism is evil. Their philosophy centers on Marxist and socialist traditions and seek radical change to overcome the capitalist order. The term antifa means simply anti-fascists. To understand the methodology of this current movement, let us first look at the definition of fascism by Merriam-Webster- “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.” Another name for fascism is ethnic nationalism. Antifa claims to be against fascism. The globalists and anti-fascist fear President Donald Trump. They dislike his free market, business first/ America first philosophy and have convinced the MSM and alt-left politicians that he is a white nationalist with dictatorial tendencies. Antifa’s dislike and hatred of “nationalism” and the political right, who extols nationalism’s benefits, aligns with the cause of the globalists. The globalists achieve their end without the label of radicals. Their movement only needs radical actors to seek change. Antifa is a pawn of the globalists.
     Many claim that the members of antifa are socialists and Marxist, Bernie supporters who live in their parent’s basement. From where did antifa sprout? This Wikipedia article ((Antifa (United States)) may provide some answers. “Individuals involved in the movement tend to hold anti-authoritarian,[26] anti-capitalist[20][33] and anti-government views,[20] subscribing to a range of left-wing ideologies.[34] A majority of adherents are anarchists, communists and other socialists who describe themselves as revolutionaries,[41] although some social democrats and other leftists adhere to the antifa movement.[41] When Italian dictator Benito Mussolini consolidated power under his National Fascist Party in the mid-1920s, an oppositional anti-fascist movement surfaced both in Italy and countries such as the United States. Many anti-fascist leaders in the United States were anarchist, socialist and syndicalist émigrés from Italy with experience in labor organizing and militancy.[51] Ideologically, antifa in the United States sees itself as the successor to anti-Nazi activists of the 1930s. European activist groups that originally organized to oppose World War II-era fascist dictatorships re-emerged in the 1970s and 1980s to oppose white supremacy and skinheads, eventually spreading to the United States.[50] After World War II and prior to the development of the modern antifa movement, violent confrontations with fascist elements continued sporadically.[52] ... Modern antifa politics can be traced to opposition to the infiltration of Britain’s punk scene by white power skinheads in the 1970s and 1980s, and the emergence of neo-Nazism in Germany following the fall of the Berlin Wall.[42] In Germany, young leftists, including anarchists and punk fans, renewed the practice of street-level anti-fascism.[42] Columnist Peter Beinart writes that “in the late ’80s, left-wing punk fans in the United States began following suit, though they initially called their groups Anti-Racist Action (ARA) on the theory that Americans would be more familiar with fighting racism than they would be with fighting fascism.[42] ... Dartmouth College historian Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, credits the ARA as the precursor of modern antifa groups in the United States.[26] In the late 1980s and 1990s, ARA activists toured with popular punk rock and skinhead bands in order to prevent Klansmen, neo-Nazis and other assorted white supremacists from recruiting.[42][53][54]”
     Antifa’s most recent origin in Germany was the result of the merger of East and West Germany and the fight against nationalism and Nazi ideals. In the United States, their cause was racism because nationalism was an unforeseeable future cause. Today, antifa combines the causes of racism and nationalism and falsely identifies economic nationalism with ethnic nationalism. This is how their scheme works. The Soros groups for globalism use antifa as the agitators and antifa uses BLM marches or any other movement for their license to riot. Globalists target and fund an opportunity to exploit a peaceful march of blacks protesting the killing of George Floyd, for example. Then antifa commandeers the protests. Count the number of societal defects to exploit: cops killing blacks, movie moguls raping women, black on white crime, and white on black crime. Other causes they exploit are the WOKE movement, ME TOO movement, Muslim Lives Matter, the Colin Kaepernick movement, white privilege and the LGBTQ movement. Another tactic is to ridicule the use of words like Muslim Islamic terrorists and Chinese Wuhan virus. If you use these words, you are somehow a racist. Notice how they ostracize right leaning groups like Blue Lives Matter, All lives Matter, Christian democrats, nationalists and they turn the MSM and alt left politicians against these right leaning groups. They call for boycotts or firings or outright extortion and bribery when an event triggers them. These militant techniques come from the pages of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals — “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.” Here are a couple of other extremist rules- “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules” and “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” Globalism is the ultimate goal and its movement can easily identify with present day societal defects. Of foremost importance, it is not based on Christian values and ethics. This chaos is done to defeat the economic nationalism President Trump has inspired in America and around the world.
     The real fascists of today are entrenched politicians, the so-called swamp. The swamp exists in every nation. Putin and Xi are prime examples. Look at Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Venezuela, North Korea, and Iran. Their dictators exalt nation over the individual and use force to suppress opposition. Fortunately, leaders change in a democracy. The problem with globalism is that some supreme leader must issue the dictates that everyone must follow. Is not that fascism per se, fascism by definition? No dissent in these countries. They often seek racial purity. Remember ISIS. Remember how black Africans were treated in China or how the Uyghurs are imprisoned in China. The EU is falling apart. Great Britain is leaving, Italy is threatening exit and Hungary is always a thorn in the side of the ruling commission of the EU in Brussels. These anti-fascists in the West are fighting against fascism that does not exist in their home countries. Fascism is a pent up issue by the globalists. Fascism and economic nationalism cannot be lumped into the same definition. Economic nationalism has nothing to do with race. America first applies to all Americans. These globalist ideals are failing within the EU but economic nationalism is alive and well in the United States.

Immigration

     Immigration injustice is another prime crisis to exploit. The so-called lingering disadvantages of citizens of poor nations tug at the heartstrings of liberal Europeans and Americans who once colonized these less fortunate countries. Today in the year 2020, a mass migration of people is taking place around the world. Migrants are moving from so-called third world countries to the more affluent industrialized countries. This migration event has been taking place for some time now, maybe starting up to 30 years ago. Why are people migrating? Historically the main reason for migration has been religion. People left their countries and moved to America because she offered the newcomer freedom to practice their religious beliefs. Today religion has become secularized and no one is really concerned about practicing religion much less migrating for that purpose. The silent jihad is about economics. Emigrants from Muslim nations are overwhelming the European nations to the extent that the problem has now become a crisis. The spread of Islam may not be their primary objective but the Muslims force cultural change on their hosts and the host country’s former Christian identity becomes weakened. The Central and South American migrants into the United States are mostly Christians; therefore, their migration is not based on religion but an invasion just the same. If the reasons for migration are not religious, the only other explanation must be economic. People move for financial reasons. But why do so many people leave Africa for Europe. One reason may be that jobs are more plentiful in Europe than in Africa. The same logic holds for American and Central and South America. Another major reason is the free economic benefits the Europeans and Americans provide to these migrants. Many European countries provide monthly stipends and free medical insurance. Why would people not migrate when such free giveaways are handed out without a reciprocal work requirement? The United States supplies similar giveaways. She provides food stamps, Medicaid, free schooling, housing assistance, utilities assistance, free daycare and earned income tax credits. These giveaways advance the illegal immigration cause of the globalists but many citizens of these invaded countries have had enough, thus the rise of economic nationalism.
     The globalists create an invasion of European countries by Muslims under the pretense of economic solidarity. They are sent across the Mediterranean and through Turkey with their journey financed by Soros funded NGOs. Why not go to other wealthy Muslim countries? The process is similar in the United States. These wealthy countries, Western Europe and America, create a draw for the have-nots. If we take in every poor person from Central and South America, our country collapses. If Europe takes in every displaced Middle Easterner because of their wars, Europe collapses. Economic nationalists are opposed to these silent jihads supported by leftist groups and their organizations. Here is a list of NGOs composed by the United Nations. https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/list-approved-ngos-and-csos Some pro-migration NGOs in Europe include the Migrant Offshore Aid Station (MOAS), Caritas Germany, Doctors without Borders, Save the Children, Watch The Med, W2EU (short for ‘Welcome to Europe’), SOS Méditerranée, Sea Watch, Life Boat Project, Sea Eye, Jugend Rettet in Germany, Boat Refugee in the Netherlands, and Proactiva Open Arms in Spain. Hundreds of others exist, many supported by Soros. Here is a list of Soros funded groups by his Open Society Institute for the year 2015 https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/cd6e5010-c2d2-4938-b3d6-058b896f6877/open-society-initiative-for-europe-2015-20170424.pdf . Here are a few Soros funded groups in America: Media Matters for America, Center for Public Integrity, Human Rights Watch, Priorities USA Action, American Bridge 21st Century, America Votes, Millennium Promise, Tides Center and Foundation, United we Dream, RAICES, Alianza, International Migration Initiative, DREAMers, Moveon.org, CASA de Maryland, the Center for Popular Democracy, Make the Road New York, People for the American Way, Vera Institute, Doctors Without Borders, Southern Poverty Law Center, Foundation to Promote Open Society, Center for American Progress, Free Press, National Hispanic Media Coalition, and Color of Change. George Soros promotes a globalist agenda of open borders by openly supporting illegal migration. He exploits economic nationalism by falsely claiming and misidentifying the phenomena as ethnic nationalism. Ethnicity excites and ignites the sentiment and hatred of antifascists, therefore anarchy happens.

Conclusion

     Marxism and socialism are not the answers to poverty around the world and will never become the answer. We will always have the poor among us. Free giveaways burden everyone, even the ones on the receiving end. Someone must work to produce the goods we need to survive and thrive. In addition, these goods will never be distributed evenly in socialist societies. Democracy and free enterprise will always be the answer for free, prosperous peoples of the world to survive with dignity. We will never live in a utopian society where treatment of the races by each other will become perfect. Nor will allowing illegal immigration into wealthy, western countries solve the problems of the peoples left behind. Economic nationalism benefits everyone in America: blacks, whites, Latinos and Asians. Our free enterprise system and Christian principles provide continuity and stability. Without them, this country and our way of life will not survive. You do not want to see the results of radical change in Western Europe and America.

​     Homosexuals and divorced and civilly remarried couples have overtaken the Catholic Church.  Can you still remember that famous question posited to Pope Francis on one of his early plane trips when a reporter asked him if women could become priests and if homosexuals could marry in the Catholic Church? His answer was not a definite “no” to either question as you recall and left open the possibility of future scandal for the Church.  Then in 2016, the Pope decided to publish his exhortation,   Amoris Laetitia, and so began the current schism among priests within the Catholic Church between the homosexuals and the celibate.  Jesus himself, who never married, handed down the celibacy mandate of the Catholic Church.  Moreover, Jesus condemned homosexuality without question and commanded marriage to be permanent. Yet in Amoris Laetitia, the Pope opened an assortment of problems.  He stated that married and civilly divorced couples could receive the Eucharist in Mass and that the Church should freely accept and possibly extend the Eucharist to practicing homosexuals.  These two statements clearly go against 2000 years of established truths of the Catholic Church through revelation and tradition, which holds the indissolvability of marriage and a complete prescription against homosexuality.  Thereafter, Archbishop Chaput of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia immediately released “Pastoral Guidelines for Implementing Amoris Laetitia” which forbade divorced and civilly remarried heterosexuals and homosexuals, whether married or not, from receiving the Eucharist or taking part in the administration of Catholic Church functions. The issuance of the guidelines was immediately followed by a dubia signed by four cardinals and addressed to Pope Francis. The five dubia were short and concise questions requiring “yes” or “no” answers from the Pope about these issues raised by Amoris Laetitia.  Pope Francis never responded. In 2017 a Filial Correction of Pope Francis was signed by 62 church scholars, which stated that the Pope has “effectively upheld seven heretical positions about marriage, the moral life, and the reception of the sacraments, and has caused these heretical opinions to spread in the Catholic Church.”  Again, the Pope remained silent. During Easter week of 2019 prominent theologians and philosophers within the Catholic Church issued an “Open letter to the bishops of the Catholic Church” which accused the Pope of the crime of heresy based on seven specific positions that he has publicly and consistently taken since Amoris Laetitia and which are clearly against the magisterium.  They demand that the Pope recant these heretical positions, or, in the alternative, that the bishops declare him a heretic and remove him from the Chair of Peter.  The letter then switches gear and begins to list numerous priests, bishops and cardinals by name who have either been accused of homosexual activity and sexual assault or who have protected others accused of such crimes, and who have been placed in positions of authority at the Vatican.  The letter also mentions the secret agreement of the Pope to allow the rulers of communist China to appoint Catholic bishops.  (I wonder if Peter and Paul would have ever given Nero the authority to appoint bishops.)
     Becoming, and then, remaining a priest is a privilege not a right.  The privilege carries with it great responsibilities including celibacy and total sexual abstinence, which also applies to married and civilly divorced couples. Divorce in the Catholic Church is allowed if a defect can be proven in the marriage.  Any violation of the natural or divine law requires immediate termination of priestly privileges and marital vows for the sake of the sanctity of the Church.  Scandal is prohibited in the Church.  The accused has the burden of proving his innocence.  He has no right of innocence until proven guilty, no right to trial, no right against self-incrimination and no property right.  Unfortunately, the Church has taken upon itself 400 years of social relativism-old traditions, political designs and ideas of men seeking freedoms from tyrannical and oppressive laws in 15th century kingdoms following the Reformation.  The Church is not a democracy or a republic.  The church is an institution created by God for the flourishment of human endeavor. Divine law must rule within the Church, not man-made rights based on the natural law. Violation of divine law requires natural law consequences, immediate termination until one proves his own innocence.
      Do not believe this article about the things you have just read.  Read the documents yourself by a quick search on google. Can you see what deviation from the divine law does?  It only brings in scandal, confusion, depravity and chaos.  It weakens the foundation upon which the Catholic Church was built. It is always evil and can only cause strife and division.  Speak up! Love heals all wounds.  If the Church, which Christ started, falls into ruin, it is only your eternal soul that is in jeopardy. 

​Becoming, and then, existing as a priest is a privilege not a right.  The privilege carries with it great responsibilities.  Any violation of the natural or divine law requires immediate termination of the privilege for the sake of the sanctity of the Church.  Scandal is not allowed in the Church.  The accused has the burden of proving his innocence.  He has no right of innocence until proven guilty, no right to trial, no right against self-incrimination and no property right.  Unfortunately, the Church has taken upon itself 200 year old political designs and ideas of men seeking freedom from tyrannical and oppressive kingdoms.  The Church is not a democracy or a republic.  The church is an institution created by God for the flourishment of human endeavor. Divine law must rule within the Church, not man-made rights based on the natural law. Violation of divine law requires natural law consequences, immediate termination until one proves his own innocence.

Where do personal rights come from?  They don’t come from God, the Pope, Congress, the President or the Supreme Court.  Rights come from the United States Constitution. Of course, the rights under discussion here are limited to our constitutional rights and we will only briefly address human rights and/or civil rights espoused by this group or that sect at the end of this article.  Activist run around the country yelling for this right or that. Take for example medical insurance.  Health care is not a “right” just as marriage or abortion are not rights; none of these "rights" are found in our Constitution; when the court starts dishing out "rights" willy-nilly, then everything becomes a right. Just because the Catechism of the Catholic Church states that: “the political community has a duty to ensure . . . in keeping with the country’s institutions . . . the right to medical care,” does not equate that medical care should be a “right” possessed by all citizens of the United States under our constitution.  It might be a positive and honorable thing to do, grant free medical coverage to all United States citizens, but Catholic positions do not create “rights.” Many would argue that abortions and homosexual marriages are not rights under Catholic theology yet the Supreme Court has somehow found these two “rights” in our constitution.  My argument is that if constitutional rights are not specifically delineated in our constitution, then rights cannot be manufactured out of thin air by the judiciary.  That theory of constitutional interpretation is called “strict constructionism.” Here are a list of rights specifically delineated in the first ten amendments to our constitution called the Bill of Rights: Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition; Right to keep and bear arms; No quartering of soldiers; Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; Right to due process of law, freedom from self-incrimination and double jeopardy; Right to a speedy and public trial; Right of trial by jury in civil cases; Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.  Citizens also have the right to move freely within our country. All other rights are retained by the individual citizen of the United States or reserved to the States respectively as per our constitution. If amendments nine and ten of the constitution bear any weight, then the States are empowered to determine which additional rights its citizens maintain, not the United States Supreme Court.
​
However, these amendments imply that other rights do exist. And, of course, humans have numerous rights. The right to vote, for example, is implied within the constitution, yet that right was excluded from slaves and women for a period of time. We still exclude felons from the right to vote today thus the right to vote is not an unalienable right. Voting is a privilege.   Most people confuse rights with privileges. Driving is a privilege.  Shelter, food and clothing are privileges. Sex is a privilege. A job with a certain wage is a privilege. Marriage and having children are privileges. Some of these privileges are extend by God and some are extended by government.  To create rights, the Supreme Court often wrongly uses the phrase   “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” found in the preamble of the Declaration of Independence, a completely separate document from our constitution,  . Notice that the drafters of our constitution recognized that our rights do come from our creator, God.  But only the right to life and liberty can be protected by government. Happiness is a personal choice.  Let’s look at the three. Your “life” depends on when God decides to call you home.  But government does try and protect your “life” from a criminal or an incompetent doctor for example. Speaking of life, the right to life (not being killed) begs the question whether an embryo possess a right to life. A civilized, compassionate society would answer in the affirmative. Humans have an unalienable right to “life.” Humans do not have the right to take another human’s life under any circumstance. Liberty is a broad right.  Liberty, to the founders, meant freedom from monarch oppression. Liberty today is freedom from government oppression. We are free to move from one state to another. We are free to do what we want, when we want, but many laws, rules and regulations prevent inexhaustible liberty.  We cannot commit crimes or we get locked in prison. Notice how the right to life and liberty are structurally underpinned by a moral framework. Happiness comes within extremes. True happiness, one could argue, is based on a perfect morality. Yet some define happiness broadly as any action which does not place a burden on another’s right of self-preservation and happiness. These three rights, life, liberty and happiness, are derived and expressed on some principled basis with a distinction between right and wrong. Are we to use our judo Christian heritage to prosecute its morality? In conclusion, we can see that a good definition of a right is that it is a state or condition that is individual or personal, shared by all humans and can never be taken away by government or other people.

​Aren’t you tired of hearing the alt-left calling President Trump names?  The alt-left includes Hollywood, the progressives and the main stream media (MSM). Every time Trump opens his mouth, especially with a tweet, they call him names.  And now every time he takes an action for the good of the country, they call him names.  This name calling is a symptom of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).  The name calling began with Hilary Clinton during her failed presidential race and the alt-left has picked up on this tactic to mobilize and then radicalize their political base.  Clinton called Trump every name in the book: racist (a dislike of other races), xenophobic (dislike of people from other countries) homophobic (dislike of homosexuals and LGBTQ community), fascist (philosophy of strong autocratic control), sexist (stereotypes of social roles based on sex),   misogynist (a person who hates women), and bigot (a person who is intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices.) This name calling is used as political slander to appease and pander to a shrinking base of the alt-left.  You even have white political candidates going around the country saying that their color (race) gave them advantages. Gillibrand said ‘I Have benefited because of my whiteness.’ Even AOC has used the tactic against their own calling Pelosi a racist.  Main stream America does not think and talk this way with such a warped, politically correct view and hatred of our society and our country.  In fact, main stream America loves just about every action President Trump takes on behalf of our blessed country.  Because the use of these words have not been successful with main stream America, the left and the MSM have now begun to use simpler words such as idiot, incompetent, and liar. Middle America will not be misled by this name calling.  Trump keeps winning with all the political promises he made during the 2016 election.  And Trump will win again in 2020 to the absolute disgust of the alt-left and the MSM.

Only US citizens can vote for members of Congress thus reapportionment must be based on US citizenship.  (Local governments can allow illegals to vote, for example mayor, if they so choose.)  The federal government controls federal elected positions, which only includes President and VP and the house and senate.  A citizenship question is a necessity for federal elections. If I were president, I would create separate election dates for these positions to be held on days with no state or local elections in order to prevent election fraud in federal elections.  These local sanctuary cities are allowing illegals to vote in local elections and as a by-product, the illegals are probably voting in federal elections.  This whole scheme of illegal voting  is a fraud on the taxpayer and our American way of life. 

​Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution addresses the House of Representatives, how are they to be chosen and their qualifications.  One qualification is that you must be a citizen of the US for at least seven years.  The article then proceeds to address how the members of the House are apportioned among the states.  It commands a 10 year census in order that the number of representatives be determined according to population. “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”  The first word “Numbers” refers to number of states in the Union.  The second word “Number” refers to population. The real question is whether you must be a citizen of the United States to be counted in the census.  I would say yes.  First, the Article addresses apportioning representatives and their qualifications.  Second only US citizens are allowed to vote for US Representatives. Therefore you must be a citizen to be counted in the census.

A vote for Joe Biden is a vote for Hillary Clinton for president.  If Biden gets the nomination, he will pick Hillary Clinton as his running mate for VP. If Biden doesn't die quick enough, Hillary will have him eliminated and she becomes president.  Joe beware.